Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) Review

This is a long one, so if you just want to get to the score, I give it 7/10. Sticking around for the rest of my musings? There are possible spoilers, I guess.

Okay, I admit it. I went into “Star Trek Into Darkness” actively wanting to dislike it. After JJ Abrams’ previous soulless entry into Trek lore which presented flashiness, gimmickry and an understanding of little else beyond character names and places, I’d grown to dislike it almost as much as “Star Trek: Nemesis”. Almost. However, “Into Darkness” makes me believe Abrams was telling the truth when he said he wasn’t a Trek fan when he directed the first film but he became one during the making of it.

This time around, the story is tighter, the characters more recognisable and the lens flares are much reduced. The wider implications of the events of the ‘first’ film are fleshed out, lending much-needed credence to why this universe is so different to the one we knew and the nods and winks to established continuity (Praxis! Gorn! Section 31!) are subtle and welcome (unlike the previous film’s crass take on the Kobayashi Maru). “Into Darkness” plays with the pieces from classic Trek’s finest film and although it flirts with parody, it ultimately pulls off an exciting homage, although the direct lifting of dialogue goes beyond a cheeky nod and any sense of sacrifice is rendered moot within moments. It’s nice to see how London has fared over the next two hundred years, though. Boris has been busy!

Oh, there are still a few problems such as the ridiculously long and OTT musical crescendo when we first see Benedict Cumberbatch: honestly, they’d have been more subtle with a pipe organ playing dun-dun-duuuuuuh. I also have a real problem believing in a military organisation that hands out and takes away command of starships like they were rental cars and I thought the occasional swearing unnecessary and out of place.

These are just minor quibbles, but the trouble with quibbles is they can overwhelm the good, like they did in the last film.  Whatever else has changed, you can probably still rely on the even-numbered Star Trek films to be better than their odd-numbered counterparts. It’s certainly an action-packed, surprisingly not too Earthbound summer blockbuster and maybe the best Star Trek film since First Contact. It looked great in IMAX and the 3D was top-notch – the first time I’ve ever reflexively blinked because I thought something was going to hit me in the eye. It’s still not the Trek I love, but it’s Trek I’m warming to a bit more now in the rosy afterglow of Abrams’ trademark spectacle. And, if nothing else, it’s given me a new hope for Star Wars Episode VII.

star trek into darkness


Related posts

Nielsen Ratings: The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear (1991) Review

Nielsen Ratings: The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear (1991) Review

When “The Naked Gun” hit big, a sequel was all but inevitable and three years later, Leslie Nielsen picked up Frank Drebin’s badge and gun once again for “The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell Of Fear”. With Jerry Zucker off directing “Ghost”, David Zuker took sole directing duties, writing the...

The Shallows (2016) Review

The Shallows (2016) Review

A minimalist horror-thriller that squanders its potential by opting for cliché over creativity, “The Shallows” has some genuine thrills to offer before things go off the deep end.Mourning the recent loss of her mother and seeking some direction, Nancy (Blake Lively) searches out a...

Craggus’ Christmas Countdown Day 6: White Christmas (1954)

Craggus' Christmas Countdown Day 6: White Christmas (1954)

‘Paramount Pictures Proudly Presents’ this film, which instantly made me smile. I mean, studios these days still present films, but when was the last time they proudly presented one? It makes me think of your children bringing home a macaroni and glitter picture and showing it to you as if...

Fast & Furious 9 (2021) finds the franchise, without The Rock, in a hard place.

Fast & Furious 9 (2021) finds the franchise, without The Rock, in a hard place.

Famously, the cast of the original STAR TREK didn’t get on. In that, at least, there is some common ground between STAR TREK and THE FAST AND THE FURIOUS. A similar rift exists at the heart of the “when you’re here, you’re family” franchise thanks to the lingering animus between Dwayne “The...

1 Comment

  1. captainlimey September 11, 2013

    “The trouble with quibbles”! Ha ha! I am enjoying your reviews immensely. Many are, indeed, way more entertaining than the films themselves (vide: Sharknado).

Comments are closed.