I lament the near total lack of monkeying around in simian sequel Dawn Of The Planet Of The Apes

Where “Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes” was a pleasant much-better-than-expected surprise, it’s sequel (the sequel to the prequel after the [failed*] reboot of the franchise) has a much higher standard to live up to.

Set ten years after the events of the previous film, “Dawn Of The Planet Of The Apes” picks up after the total worldwide collapse of human civilisation. Caesar (Andy Serkis) and his fellow apes have settled in the Muir Woods north of San Francisco and developed a thriving colony based on a hierarchical hunter/gatherer society. Meanwhile, a group of humans genetically immune to the devastating simian flu have established a fledgling settlement in the ruins of San Francisco but desperately need power to sustain their commune. The key to that power is a hydroelectric dam deep within the apes’ territory. Although first contact almost goes is potentially disastrously wrong, cooler heads prevail and Caesar enters into an uneasy truce with the humans, hoping for peace. But on both sides, there are those who cannot forgive and forget and whose hawkish instincts for self-preservation will bring both populations to the brink of annihilation.

Director Matt Reeves (“Cloverfield”, “Let Me In”) brings a sombre aesthetic to this post-apocalyptic tale of warring species and the resultant tone is unrelentingly grim and serious, with precious few moments of levity to alleviate the sense of impending doom and genocidal stakes. The film looks spectacular, with the derelict San Francisco and the ape citadel brimming with rich attention to detail.

The motion capture performances of the actors and the special effects people who translate them are astonishing, and it’s a testament to the abilities of those involved that the movie actually feels more vibrant, alive and engaging when there are few or no humans on screen and the apes dominate the proceedings. In terms of individual performances, would somebody please just give Andy Serkis a Best Actor Oscar already? The guy is phenomenal in these roles, but it seems award panels are blind to the skill required to bring these characters to life if the actor themselves doesn’t appear onscreen (similar to Scarlett Johansson missing out for her brilliant turn in “Her) and his Caesar is a powerhouse of a performance, dominating the film and the cast around him. By contrast, the human actors are something of a let-down, not helped by a deeply biased script with the richness of the characterisation of the apes is in stark contrast to the mostly underwritten and underdeveloped humans. Jason Clarke is a fine actor, but he feels lightweight and ineffectual as the leading man here, certainly nowhere near the level of gravitas and presence of his predecessors who include Charlton Heston, Mark Wahlberg and James Franco (who appears in a brief cameo by virtue of a salvaged video camera recording). Keri Russell is adequate in a disposably clichéd ‘compassionate doctor’ role while despite the trailers making it seem anything but, Gary Oldman’s role is tantamount to a glorified cameo.

The story itself is, beat for beat, entirely predictable and there are zero twists or surprises than can’t be seen coming a mile away. However the entire production is so well put together and so spectacularly tense to watch that the grim inevitability of the way events unfold actually becomes an asset in delivering this downbeat, dystopian future. For a film franchise so steeped in allegory, and which it could be argued played its very best allegorical hand at the end of the original film back in 1968, it’s refreshing to find that there’s still a strong focus on intelligent, serious sci-fi as metaphor at play here. Channelling a very contemporary ideological clash between the hawks and the doves on both sides of the conflict, the film finds time to comment on the nature of leadership, the rule of law, the murkiness and compromise necessary for diplomacy and the dangers of home-grown terrorism.

Not a typical, uplifting summer blockbuster by any stretch of the imagination, “Dawn Of The Planet Of The Apes” is a compelling, intelligent and serious science fiction film, expertly weaving humanity’s tendency towards violence and destruction into a tragic clash of cultures in the ruins of the world we live in now.

* I actually really enjoy Tim Burton’s 2001 “Planet Of The Apes”. Well, apart from the last ten minutes, obviously. If that film had just ended as the spaceship rocketed into space…

dawn of the planet of the apes review
Score 8/10
logo

Related posts

Maleficent: Mistress Of Evil (2019) Review

Maleficent: Mistress Of Evil (2019) Review

Maleficent: Mistress Of Evil makes a genuine attempt to spread its wings Well, well. Who would have thought in a year of play-it-safe ‘live-action’ remakes – some good, others not so much – Disney would release a beastie like “Maleficent: Mistress Of Evil”, an elaborate fantasy...

Doctor Who: The Witchfinders Review

Doctor Who: The Witchfinders Review

The Doctor, the Witch and the wardrobe department Shirt Watch: Blue (I’m the only person doing shirt watch, aren’t I?) If last week’s episode was a move towards Doctor Who orthodoxy, “The Witchfinders” positively revels in Doctor Who tropery and it’s all the better for it. I...

Doctor Who: Pyramids Of Mars

Doctor Who: Pyramids Of Mars

The first time Doctor Who dared to ask: Are You My Mummy? When it comes to classic Doctor Who, few stories are as iconic as Pyramids of Mars. First aired in the crisp October of 1975, this four-part serial from thirteenth season, Tom Baker’s second, is a gothic-tinged tale of...

Borderlands (2024) Review

Borderlands (2024) Review

With some films you need to decide if your glass of piss wash is half full or half empty. I went into the Borderlands movie with no prior knowledge of Borderlands (beyond the vague awareness it existed). I’ve never played any of the games and know nothing of its lore. I also knew...

Doctor Who: Extremis Review

Doctor Who: Extremis Review

Grab a red pill and prepare to decipher the Doc Vinci code After playing a blinder last week, what did “Doctor Who” have in store for us this time? Well, after the refreshingly straightforward run of episodes, "Extremis" opens a can of vintage convoluted timey-wimey whoop-ass...

Heart Eyes (2025) Review

Heart Eyes (2025) Review

Finally a movie for the heart and the blood that pumps through it. It's just a fact of cinema that some genres have formulas. It doesn't necessarily follow that something formulaic is inherently bad, though. The formulae exist for a very good reason - they're popular and successful. What...

The Omen (1976) Review

The Omen (1976) Review

Merry Anti-Christmas! And god bless us, everyone! Much these days is made of so-called elevated horror but back in the mid-seventies, The Omen brought us dignified horror, or at least as dignified as a horror which prominently features baboon genitalia during one of its set pieces can...

Ghostbusters II (1989) Review

Ghostbusters II (1989) Review

Ghostbusters II should be the reason people are wary of another Ghostbusters movie… “Ghostbusters II” is the sequel nobody wanted to make, and boy does it show. It betrays the ending of the first film in a worse way than “The Matrix Reloaded” does. If you’re currently girding your...