Craggus’ Christmas Countdown Day 4: The Grinch (2000)

0412 The GrinchRon Howard, you’ve done it again. Hollywood’s most chameleonic director transforms his style once more to give us a vividly realised world of Whoville and its nearby mountain dweller, The Grinch. Adaptations of Dr Seuss are tricky things as much of the joy of his books is from the rhyme and metre of the verse and not just the worlds and characters contained therein. There can be a tendency to rely too much on narration but “The Grinch” tries hard to strike a balance.

Jim Carrey excels as the titular green-eyed monster and his knowing, rubbery performance does much to lift the film, indeed the scenes without Carrey in them feel a little bit lifeless.

The script does what it can to expand the story to feature length without feeling too padded and by and large does a good job. The Whos themselves are well played and the early emphasis on the material aspects of Christmas underlines the epiphany at the story’s end which ultimately redeems the Grinch. Make up and performance-wise, the realisation of The Grinch himself is spot on but the rest of the film feels ever so slightly off. Whoville, while undeniably colourful and intensely Christmassy, feels too dark and gloomy. The design work is great but the subdued lighting gives the whole city a vaguely sinister atmosphere which, combined with the character make-up comes perilously close to being a candy-coated nightmare fuel rather than a whimsical children’s fable.

Perhaps it’s my heart that needs to grow three sizes larger, but even an energetic central performance from Carrey can’t stop this feeling like a missed opportunity. It’s a near miss, but a miss nonetheless. “The Grinch” is an adequate, but lacklustre, festive treat.

5/10 

3 thoughts on “Craggus’ Christmas Countdown Day 4: The Grinch (2000)

  1. This film is extremely overproduced, and the new material added to the original story is prosaic. But Jim Carrey is brilliant (“Bleeding hearts of the world unite!”) and to me a slightly sinister quality is usually a plus in a kid’s movie. I think we finally found a style of film that Ron Howard could not quite pull off, but he gave it his all and made an effort to stay true to the spirit of the book.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.