See it on as big a screen as possible and in as many dimensions as you can

Any lingering concerns you may have had about another director named George revisiting a trilogy after thirty years have gone by can be laid to rest. “Mad Max Fury Road” is a triumph: a perfect demonstration of how to harness decades’ worth of advancement in filmmaking technology and techniques without losing sight of what made the originals so great in the first place. Take that, other George.

Less of a hard reboot and more of a side-quel, “Fury Road” blends elements of “The Road Warrior” and “Beyond Thunderdome” to tell a whole new story, branching off from the original “Mad Max” and giving us an alternative but not entirely disconnected timeline. To be honest, it’s best not to dwell on it and you won’t really have the time or the inclination.

With greater resources than ever before, Miller’s vision is gloriously realised and the splendid desolation and tribal brutality of his post-apocalyptic wasteland explodes onto screen in a riot of colour and grotesquery. Miller has sacrificed none of his gruesome aesthetic in bringing his hero to modern audiences, with the ravages of primitive barbarity and the legacy of nuclear war fully realised by one of the most visually striking cast of characters ever assembled.

Tom Hardy is a superb choice as our new Max, his madness more angry and defiant than the teetering-on-the-edge craziness of Mel Gibson. Theron’s Imperator Furiosa is every bit the badass equal of Max without stealing the focus of the film. Their slowly evolving partnership along with Nicholas Hoult’s scene-stealing turn as Nux creates a wonderfully twisted nightmare version of the family road trip from Hell.

And Hell it is, dominated by the gruesome Immortan Joe and his inbred dynasty and policed by a fleet of monstrous engines of destruction and it’s in the vehicular mayhem that the film doesn’t just raise the bar, it annihilates it. The stunt work is simply breath-taking here, and most of it done without using CGI. The twisting, rending and shredding of gears, pistons and metal is bone-shatteringly visceral and made all the more shocking thanks to Miller’s willingness to literally throw characters under the bus in a way that would make even George R R Martin pause for thought.

Miller’s genius for mechanised mayhem does for car chases what “The Raid 2” did for fight choreography but there’s more to the film than macabre freaks and near non-stop action. There’s a surprising amount of emotional heft to the carnage and ultimately it becomes a story of revolution and redemption disguised as an extended car chase.

Shot superbly against the stunning landscapes of Namibia, this is a film to see on as big a screen as you can find and in as many dimensions as you are able. This is Miller’s masterpiece and it’s not something you watch, it’s something you experience.

mad max fury road review
Score 10/10
logo

Related posts

Bad Santa (2003) Review

Bad Santa (2003) Review

No need to wonder if he's naughty or nice… A Christmas movie to watch once the kids are safely tucked up in bed, “Bad Santa” is not for the easily offended. Billy Bob Thornton stars as Willie Soke, a washed up, bitter con man who spends his Christmases working as mall Santa so that he...

Good Boys (2019) Review

Good Boys (2019) Review

Good Boys isn't nearly as transgressive as it wants to make out, but is still plenty funny There’s been a bit of Helen Lovejoy handwringing about the appropriateness of using young actors to anchor a crude adult-orientated comedy but while the language in "Good Boys" certainly isn’t...

Final Destination 5 (2011) Review

Final Destination 5 (2011) Review

The survivors of Final Destination 5 should envy the dead Always at the more tongue-in-cheek end of the horror scale, the previous four instalments of the Final Destination franchise have been gruesomely lightweight shock fests, full of invention and sly dark comedy although they...

The Exorcist: Believer (2024) Review

The Exorcist: Believer (2024) Review

The Exorcist: Believer fails to make your head spin First things first, I'ma write all the words inside my head, I'm fired up and tired of this dreary old cash-in [ooh-ooh], a charmless litany of cliché [ooh-ooh]. Second things second, don't you tell me that you think that it could...

Zoltan: Hound Of Dracula (1977) Review

Zoltan: Hound Of Dracula (1977) Review

Maybe not all dogs go to heaven… This is a real dogs’ dinner of a Dracula movie. It would have been risible nonsense if it had been played for laughs as a comedy but as a deadly serious horror movie, it’s more dog’s egg than the dog’s bollocks, and it owes its entire plot to the idea...

My Little Pony: The Movie (2017) Review

My Little Pony: The Movie (2017) Review

I took my little Craggling (and her friend) to see My Little Pony: The Movie. My Little Pony trots back to the big screen with a cinematic outing based on the wildly successful (and surprisingly cross-generational) ‘Friendship Is Magic’ incarnation of the toy franchise. As she is busy...

Sex Tape (2014) Review

Sex Tape (2014) Review

Being accidentally topical isn't enough to save the aggressively unfunny Sex Tape. Clearly the reunion of the director and stars of 2011's amusingly bawdy "Bad Teacher" was intended to replicate that film's edginess and success. Unfortunately, "Sex Tape" is an egregiously foul-mouthed...

Doctor Who: Revolution Of The Daleks Review

Doctor Who: Revolution Of The Daleks Review

This revolution should not have been televised I can’t be alone, surely, in wondering where the ‘Revolution’ was in “Revolution Of The Daleks”? In the end, there was very little about this perfunctory seasonal feature-length special that was revolutionary – or, indeed...

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter B
Peter B
10 years ago

I believe you. If this movie were not a ten out of ten, I would lose my faith in the entire field of film criticism, and would never pay attention to a coming attraction ever again. But I have a question. I am not a fan of the first three films. I don’t dislike them, but I saw the first two long ago, and honestly I don’t remember much about them. The third one lost me at Tina Turner (and maybe I was being unfair). But does knowledge of the first three films significantly enhance this new one? Should I make a point of watching them first? Or does it not matter?