You can’t stay remote from the moral dilemma presented by Eye In The Sky.

Having explored the politics and morality of warfare in 2013’s “Ender’s Game”, director Gavin Hood returns to the subject with a tense and much more topical take. This time, however, we’re not granted the vicarious safety of far-future sci-fi because this remotely controlled war is very present-day and very, very real.

A joint mission between British, Kenyan and US forces to capture a pair of wanted terrorists abruptly changes when an opportunity presents itself to not only prevent an impending terrorist attack but also take out several high priority targets. Commander Powell (Helen Mirren) presses for the authority to strike with deadly force however she must wrestle with the moral implications of the action and convince the chain of command that deadly force is necessary before the window of opportunity closes.

“Eye In The Sky” does several clever things and it does them so well and so subtly you’re not really aware of them during that first, tension-filled viewing. Firstly, it unfolds in almost real time so the increasing risk of failure is palpable as the political and military authorities prevaricate and pontificate on the legal, ethical and strategic ramifications of the mission. There are, of course, subtle cinematic sleights of hand to keep things dramatically on track but generally we’re there with everyone through the course of the mission. The other thing it does is allow us to see the domestic mundanity that surrounds these critical geopolitical situations. There is, of course, the ever-present reality of innocent collateral damage at the proposed site of the strike which is heavily emphasised throughout the film but, more unusually, we also get glimpses into the lives of the major decision makers and action takers of the drama. Scenes which border on whimsy, showing Lieutenant General Frank Benson (Alan Rickman) agonising over which toy doll to choose for his granddaughter or a hubristic Foreign Secretary being inconvenienced by a bout of food poisoning may seem superfluous to the narrative but are every bit as vital and relevant as an innocent young girl playing with her hoop in a dusty Kenyan backyard next to the terrorist compound. It’s the even-handedness in portraying the humanity and fallibility on both sides of the Reaper Drone’s camera that gives “Eye In The Sky” its potency.

The film is packed with terrific performances. Mirren captivates as the determined, hard-nosed commander with her eyes firmly on the military objective while the late Alan Rickman charms and impresses as the military liaison to the Government, resolute, diplomatic but not to be trifled with as he calmly rebuts the more emotive and sentimental of the government ministers present. Barkhad Abdi (“Captain Phillips”) also impresses as a Kenyan field agent tasked with infiltrating the terrorist held territory to gather vital intelligence for the strike.

“Eye In The Sky” is a film that offers no easy answers but presents the situation of the modern War On Terror as it is. Whichever route you come to the hard choices on offer here, this is a film that will make you think and at least cause your moral certainties to feel a little less certain. Even Spock himself would be hesitant to glibly invoke ‘the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one’ after watching this. A window to the interconnected global military reach and a profound moral dilemma to ponder on, “Eye In The Sky” is a powerful and timely reminder of the cost of warfare and the price of ‘freedom’.

eye in the sky review
Score 8/10


Hi there! If you enjoyed this post, why not sign up to get new posts sent straight to your inbox?

Sign up to receive a weekly digest of The Craggus' latest posts.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hammy Reviews
9 years ago

Hoping to see this soon!

Hammy Reviews
9 years ago
Reply to  Craig Holton

I hear bad things about Criminal…

logo

Related posts

The Magnificent Seven (2016) Review

The Magnificent Seven (2016) Review

Even Len Goodman would pause for thought before endorsing The Magnificent Seven Arriving 56 years after the original movie, 2016’s “The Magnificent Seven” is, of course, a grandchild remake, the second generation descended from the iconic “Seven Samurai”. An earnest and lavish...

A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master (1988) Review

A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master (1988) Review

Freddy steps out of your dreams and into the zeitgeist. A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master sees Freddy Krueger complete his ascent from nightmare stalker to full-blown cinematic icon. Directed by a then up-and-coming Renny Harlin, The Dream Master leans heavily into...

3615 Code Père Noël (1989) Review

3615 Code Père Noël (1989) Review

Sacrebleu! Père Noël est très méchant! A year before Home Alone became a holiday staple, 3615 Code Père Noël (also known as Dial Code Santa Claus, Deadly Games or Game Over) delivered a darker, edgier take on the idea of a child defending their home against an intruder. This 1989 French...

Doctor Who: The Woman Who Lived

Doctor Who: The Woman Who Lived

I take a stand and deliver my review of The Woman Who Lived “The Woman Who Lived” is much more of a philosophical piece than its immediate predecessor but the richness of the metaphysical musings can’t cover for the paucity of the rest of the...

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies (2016) Review

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies (2016) Review

Regency resurrections abound in Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. It is a truth universally acknowledged, that an oversaturated genre in possession of a loyal fan base must be in want of a fresh gimmick. However little known the feelings or views of such an audience may be on their...

Noah (2014) Review

Noah (2014) Review

I give Chapter & Verse on Darren Aronofsky's Noah Sadly, we will never see the definitive version of the story of Noah’s Ark as envisioned by Eddie Izzard (starring James Mason as God with Sean Connery as Noah), so we’ll have to make do with  Darren Aronofsky’s take on possibly...