Finding Dory reels me in, hook, line and sinker.

With the exception of the “Cars” franchise, Pixar themselves are the exceptions to the usual law of diminishing returns which normally plagues sequels. However, in landing a sequel to “Finding Nemo”, a perfect story that really needed no follow-up would Pixar flounder or would the carping prove bass-less?

A year after Nemo safely returned to the reef, Dory (Ellen DeGeneres) has a sudden epiphany as a memory of her parents resurfaces. Without thinking, she rushes off to try and find them, leaving Marlin (Albert Brooks) and Nemo (Hayden Rolence) to try and catch up with her and bring her home again. Meanwhile, Dory has found her way to the Marine Life Institute where she was born and together with Hank the ‘septapus’ must find her way back to the open ocean once more.

One of the secret, subtle triumphs of “Finding Nemo” was in its championing of disability, featuring as it did two key characters with disabilities without ever needing to make a big deal of it. Their challenges and adaptations were woven seamlessly into the narrative and were merely an aspect of the characters rather than their defining ability. “Finding Dory” is bolder in this regard without ever becoming pushy and it’s a little astonishing and enormously heart-warming to see a character with a learning disability take centre stage, have agency and be the heroine instead of being relegated to the background as a point of sympathy or dependency.

But then nobody tells stories like Pixar tells stories and their genius is in pushing these stale old boundaries in ways we don’t really realise while we’re watching. There’s so much attention to detail and rich texture to both the visuals and the characters that their secondary characteristics are just that: additional detail, not broad stereotypes.

“Finding Dory” may stretch the concept of fish interacting with the human world almost to breaking point at times (if you were sceptical about fish ambulating in tied plastic bags, you’re not going to take well to them managing to drive a truck, even with the help of an amputee octopus) but the characters (old and new) are just so much fun to be around that you don’t really mind the flights of fancy. It’s not a story that needed to be told, but I’m glad they found a story worth telling. I’d forgotten how much I enjoyed spending time with Dory and her friends until I was reunited with them.

finding dory review
Score 8/10


Hi there! If you enjoyed this post, why not sign up to get new posts sent straight to your inbox?

Sign up to receive a weekly digest of The Craggus' latest posts.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

logo

Related posts

The Maze Runner (2014) Review

The Maze Runner (2014) Review

Will The Maze Runner leave you a-maze-d or just glade it's finished?Adapted from James Dashner’s bestselling Young Adult Novel, “The Maze Runner” fares far better than the rest of the recent crop of YA movies thanks to an appealing cast and script which exploits the full range of...

Harry Potter And The Philosopher’s Stone (2001) Review

Harry Potter And The Philosopher's Stone (2001) Review

Like the sword of Gryffindor from the sorting hat, SweetieG returns to reflect on Harry Potter's 20th Anniversary.Hello cupcakes, remember me?  I know, I know!!  It’s been a while. Anyway, now that I’m back I want to talk to you about “Harry Potter”. Twenty years ago today...

Christine (1983) Review

Christine (1983) Review

We've been trying to reach you about your cars extended warranty: The Movie.Christine may be the only Stephen King adaptation where the car has more interior life than the protagonist, but long before Tesla made self-driving cars that burst into flames and commited the occasional...

For Your Eyes Only (1981) Review

For Your Eyes Only (1981) Review

This review is for everyone's eyes, reallyThe series may have scored its best-ever box office with “Moonraker”, but the producers weren’t oblivious to the rumblings of discontent over the perceived gimmickry and excesses the series had become synonymous with. While the approach...

Lost In Space (1998) Review

Lost In Space (1998) Review

Lost In Space gets lost in translation to the big screen.One hundred and thirty minutes. That’s the official runtime of Lost In Space (1998), but it feels a lot longer; the kind of theatrical endurance test that makes you check your watch, then the horizon, then your life choices. It’s...

The Wolf Man (1941) Review

The Wolf Man (1941) Review

The Wolf Man has a bark that's worse than his bite.Universal originally tried to introduce a wolf man to its roster of monsters in 1935’s “Werewolf Of London” but the film flopped at the box office and it would be another six years before Universal would shoot for the moon once...