Sully: Miracle On The Hudson fails to make much of a splash.

There’s an inherent challenge in creating films of real-life events, especially when those events unfolded in less time than it takes to microwave a ready meal. For Clint Eastwood’s Sully: Miracle on the Hudson, the task was to take four extraordinary minutes and turn them into a compelling 96-minute feature. The trick lies in the art of expansion—broadening the narrative without bloating it with unnecessary drama—and Eastwood largely pulls it off through a shrewd, non-linear storytelling approach and an unwavering focus on the hero at the heart of the tale: Captain Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger.

Eastwood crafts the film as much around the aftermath as the event itself, using flashbacks and imagined scenarios to build tension and explore Sully’s internal turmoil. The famous water landing is presented not just as a technical achievement but as a crucible for the man himself, a pressure cooker of second-guessing and sleepless nights. By toggling between the harrowing event and the subsequent investigation, the film creates a dual narrative: one of survival, and one of vindication.

At its heart, though, Sully is powered by Tom Hanks, who delivers a performance of quiet, understated brilliance. Hanks doesn’t just portray Sully; he embodies him, bringing out the humility, professionalism, and sheer decency that made the captain a global icon. Hanks’ Sully is no swaggering Hollywood hero; he’s a man weighed down by the burden of his own legend, haunted by what could have been and forced to defend what was. Hanks’ charm and commitment smooth over some of the screenplay’s bumpier patches, landing the film safely even when it threatens to lose altitude.

The script’s decision to cast the National Transportation Safety Board as antagonists feels forced, almost as if the writers felt the need to inject conflict into a story that was, in essence, already complete. While the investigation scenes provide a platform for Hanks to demonstrate Sully’s resilience and integrity, they also veer into melodrama, reducing the NTSB’s professionals to one-dimensional bureaucratic roadblocks. It’s a clunky choice in an otherwise deftly directed film, especially when the final act reverses course so abruptly that it borders on unintentional comedy.

Despite the film’s ensemble cast, it’s clear this is Hanks’ show, with Aaron Eckhart’s loyal co-pilot Jeff Skiles standing as the only other character given significant weight. Even then, Eckhart’s defining feature becomes his moustache, a scene-stealer in its own right and while Laura Linney does her best as Sully’s wife Lorraine, her role is confined to a series of supportive yet disposable phone calls, a frustratingly underwritten part for such a talented actress.

Ultimately, Eastwood and Hanks elevate Sully: Miracle on the Hudson above the sort of docudrama you’d expect to find on the Discovery Channel. Eastwood’s steady hand behind the camera ensures the technical sequences are gripping, particularly the recreation of the flight itself, which is shot and edited with a visceral intensity that places the viewer firmly in the cockpit. The film’s brisk runtime is both a blessing and a curse: while it prevents the story from overstaying its welcome, it also means some elements—particularly Sully’s personal life—feel underexplored.

In the end, Sully soars when it keeps its focus on the man and the moment, reminding us why Captain Sullenberger’s name became synonymous with heroism. It may strain to fill its runtime, but the film’s craftsmanship and Hanks’ effortless humanity ensure it lands safely, if not spectacularly, on cinematic solid ground.

sully: miracle on the hudson review
Score 6/10


Hi there! If you enjoyed this post, why not sign up to get new posts sent straight to your inbox?

Sign up to receive a weekly digest of The Craggus' latest posts.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

logo

Related posts

Passengers (2016) Review

Passengers (2016) Review

With Passengers, it’s better to just sit back and enjoy the ride. A surprise contender for ‘Most Divisive Film of 2016’, “Passengers” may not be the sci-fi action thriller the trailers might have led us to expect but there’s still a lot to enjoy in this literal and figurative star...

Doctor Who: Revolution Of The Daleks Review

Doctor Who: Revolution Of The Daleks Review

This revolution should not have been televised I can’t be alone, surely, in wondering where the ‘Revolution’ was in “Revolution Of The Daleks”? In the end, there was very little about this perfunctory seasonal feature-length special that was revolutionary – or, indeed...

The Green Mile (1999) Review

The Green Mile (1999) Review

A perfectly executed adaptation. Released in 1999, Frank Darabont’s second Stephen King adaptation had the unenviable task of following The Shawshank Redemption, a film so beloved it singlehandedly gave everything Darabont touched the sheen and expectation of prestige film. That The...

Vampires Suck (2010) Review

Vampires Suck (2010) Review

It's always dorkiest before the breaking dawn. I’m unapologetically fond of dumb spoof movies. I’m sorry, but that’s just how I am. Oh, I can embrace the abstract intellectualism of Jonathan Glazer or disdain the nihilistic art house pretension of Nicholas Winding Refn till the cows come...

A Muppet Family Christmas

A Muppet Family Christmas

There's no place like Fozzie's Mum's home for the holidays... Few holiday specials capture the spirit of Christmas as joyfully and wholeheartedly as A Muppet Family Christmas. First airing in 1987, this beloved special brings together the entire extended Muppet clan—yes, even the...

The Addams Family (2019) Review

The Addams Family (2019) Review

Not quite creepy, kinda kooky, breezy but not spooky, I guess it’s kind of okay, this Addams Family The most chilling thing about this latest adaptation of the cartoons of Charles Addams is that when you read the cast list, your heart breaks for what a live-action adaptation of The...