A Wrinkle In Time takes too long to iron out its plot

Buckling under the weight of its own aspirations, Ava DuVernay’s ambitious but flawed adaptation of adaptation of “A Wrinkle In Time”, Madeleine L’Engle’s perennially popular sci-fi fantasy, occasionally dazzles but all too often trips over its own feet.

Four years after their scientist father disappeared, Meg (Storm Reid) and her adopted brother Charles Wallis (Deric McCabe) are told he is still alive by the quirky and mysterious Mrs Whatsit (Reese Witherspoon). Joined by their friend Calvin (Levi Miller), they are brought to meet Mrs Who (Mindy Kaling) and eventually Mrs Which (Oprah Winfrey) and the six of them journey out into the universe to rescue their father.

If there was a weight of expectation on Disney’s second attempt to adapt “A Wrinkle In Time”, much of it was self-inflicted. From the trailer’s self-congratulatory pronouncement of the film coming from ‘visionary’ director Ava DuVernay (“Selma”) and a screenplay by Jennifer Lee (“Frozen”, “Wreck-It Ralph”, “Zootropolis”) rewriting a first draft by Jeff Stockwell (“Bridge To Teribithia”), there seems to have been a concerted effort to use the film as a vehicle for ideas and themes which don’t quite fit with the story, resulting in a sort of thematic clown car which careers from point to point, components flying in all directions as it increasingly falls apart.

Some of the problems can be traced back to the source novel for example, the character name ‘Charles Wallace’ feels awkward and clumsily long, at least to my British ears and as such its incessant repetition in dialogue quickly becomes grating. The novel’s C S Lewis-esque Christian subtext has been jettisoned in favour of a more generic good vs evil dichotomy, with a replacement focus on the empowerment of Meg in particular, although this too is constantly undermined by a screenplay which keeps Meg petulant and off-putting for too long and constantly feels the need to remind us that Charles Wallace is the chosen, special one.

Visually, the film’s middle act is a real treat. It takes a while to get going and get our heroes off Earth but when it does, especially visiting the planet Uriel, it’s at its strongest. Unfortunately, this forms the movie’s high point and it’s pretty much downhill from there. The reality-wrinkling and surreal adventures which follow sacrifice coherent storytelling in favour of a barrage of CGI set pieces until these too finally peter out and we’re left with a final act in which nothing feels earned or natural and character choices are made in service of the needs of the plot to resolve rather than organically, and the film starts breaking its own rules (Mrs Who speaks only in attributed quotations, a fun and novel idea, until she doesn’t because the film needs her to impart some information that the makers couldn’t find a quote for) just to get across the finishing line.

The performances are a mixed bag, with Oprah coming off as particularly uncomfortable with the role and requirements of such an effects-heavy production. Kaling and Witherspoon manage to keep their quirkiness charming and the children, although a little stiff, are decent enough. It’s Chris Pine, surprisingly, who impresses the most in a surprisingly emotional and heartfelt performance, until the script requires his character to make such a breathtakingly egregious Sophie’s choice which undercuts the entire emotional underpinning of the movie.

There’s no doubting DuVernay’s sincerity and ambition in trying to pull off this grand fantasy but she’s compromised by a confused and disjointed script and some stiff performances from her more experienced cast members. It’s still a serviceable family fantasy and, although it has echoes of “The Neverending Story” and “Tomorrowland: A World Beyond”, it never quite matches up to the iconic former and I can’t defend it as strongly as I would the latter. No matter its flaws, it certainly didn’t deserve the vicious backlash it received on message boards and crowd-sourced scoring sites as those who were thwarted in their vicious attempts to derail the “Black Panther” juggernaut turned on this film as their ‘consolation prize’.

a wrinkle in time review
Score 5/10


Hi there! If you enjoyed this post, why not sign up to get new posts sent straight to your inbox?

Sign up to receive a weekly digest of The Craggus' latest posts.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

logo

Related posts

Thor: Ragnarok (2017) Review

Thor: Ragnarok (2017) Review

Thor: Ragnarok paves the way to Infinity War and beyond Seventeen films in, you’d forgive Marvel for resting on their laurels but there’s no sign of fatigue as Marvel closes out its Thor trilogy with “Thor: Ragnarok”. Driven by recurring dreams of the destruction of Asgard, Thor...

Minions (2015) Review

Minions (2015) Review

Minions again proves that comedy sidekicks should remain sidekicks I saw “Minions” accompanied by Mertmas and four of his friends as part of a 9th Birthday treat, so here’s their perspective: “Minions” pretty much hits its target market spot on. The Minions themselves retain their...

30 Days Of Night (2007) Review

30 Days Of Night (2007) Review

30 Days Of Night isn't just dark for dark's sake. 30 Days of Night (2007) takes the familiar vampire trope and plunks it down in one of the most isolated, inhospitable places imaginable: Barrow, Alaska, where the sun won’t rise for a solid month. Directed by David Slade, the film adapts...

1,000th Post Spectacular!

1,000th Post Spectacular!

Okay, so ‘spectacular’ might be overselling it, but nevertheless here we are: our 1,000th post and still going strong. Well, still going at least. Over the past 1,000 posts, there have been a lot of highs: not forgetting our most-viewed post ever.  And some lows: I’ve...

Love Lies Bleeding (2024) Review

Love Lies Bleeding (2024) Review

Love, through Glass, darkly. A genre piece as sharp as its title, Love Lies Bleeding is a grimly stylish neo-noir that embraces the darker shades of love, ambition and familial power dynamics. Director Rose Glass (Saint Maud) crafts an atmospheric thriller with a serrated edge, though...

Doctor Who: Oxygen Review

Doctor Who: Oxygen Review

Sometimes, all I need is the air that I breathe and to love Who I’m always a little conflicted about voiceover narration in “Doctor Who” but it’s hard to complain here in "Oxygen" when it’s used to such cheeky effect, having Capaldi solemnly intone ‘Space: the final...

Glass (2019) Review

Glass (2019) Review

Glass sets out to shatter the superhero paradigm. Closer in tone and intent to “Unbreakable” than its immediate predecessor “Split”, “Glass” sees filmmaker M Night Shyamalan returning to the world of comic book super heroics, not to homage or reimagine them, but to deconstruct them...

Joker: Folie à Deux (2024) Review

Joker: Folie à Deux (2024) Review

The other clown shoe finally drops. The sequel to Todd Phillips' ersatz controversial Joker doesn't just pick up where the original left off—it picks at the very fabric of what made the first film resonate with its most ardent devotees. Joker: Folie à Deux is a brazen, almost spiteful...