I guess you just can’t polish a turd, no matter how windy it is…

The most puzzling thing about “Venom” is that if Sony was determined to make this film, this exact story, they already had a movie they could call it a sequel to without pissing away yet another of their Marvel IPs (which look increasingly like hostages rather than assets). I’m talking about “Life”, and it would have provided a better foundation for the story than this clumsy and inept attempt which sees Sony’s would-be Spider-Man-less Spider-Verse telling Universal’s Dark Universe to hold its beer.

Crack investigative reporter Eddie Brock (Tom Hardy) makes himself a powerful enemy when he angers the billionaire owner of the Life Foundation, Carlton Drake (Riz Ahmed) when he raises rumours of unethical medical experiments during an interview designed to reassure the public about the safety of his private space programme following a recent spacecraft crash. Having lost his job, his apartment and his fiancée, Eddie is close to rock bottom when he’s contacted by a Life Foundation scientist who wants to blow the whistle. When Eddie breaks in to investigate, he’s accidentally exposed to one of Drake’s symbiote samples recovered from the crashed spacecraft, an entity called ‘Venom’.

Tonally all over the place, “Venom” is a muddled and, at times, incoherent mess of a movie, never quite sure of what it’s meant to be. It throws in plenty of ideas but never really manages to fully develop any of them into a lucid, well-structured story. Plot points are scattered about and threads left dangling without payoff or resolution, which is particularly irritating given how clumsy and obvious much of the set-up in the first half-hour is: the obnoxiously loud neighbour, the kindly shopkeeper Mrs Chen being hustled by a gangster, the ex-fiancée’s new Doctor boyfriend: it’s all so crassly forced to show ‘good guy’ Venom and provide a handy source of exposition later on when things will need to be explained because the rest of the script won’t really bother to do it.

“Venom” is another of those movies that rely on the audience turning a blind eye to the characters we’re told are cunning and smart behaving in the most ludicrously stupid way, and none more so than Eddie Brock himself. We’re told he’s an ace reporter, and treated to a montage of his reports during the credits of his ‘Brock Report’ which will have you mentally humming the “Kent Brockman’s Eye On Springfield” theme tune but literally everything he does is really, really stupid, especially in how he finally meets the symbiote. There’s zero character development for anybody except, possibly Venom himself but his abrupt change of heart kind of comes out of nowhere and happens because the plot needs it to happen rather than for organic story reasons.

Make no mistake, there is no way this will cross over with the MCU/ Tom Holland’s Spider-Man, and not just because Venom doesn’t make sense without Spider-Man (this movie wouldn’t make sense with or without Spider-Man). There are some Marvel-esque moments, though, especially during some of the banter between Brock and Venom but the rest of the film is a murky dumpster fire of inconsistency. Saddled with a 15 certificate here in the UK, it’s nowhere near violent, bloody or droll enough to please the older, “Deadpool”-embracing audience but it’s too dark and adult [for adult read: boring, dark and slow] for the 12A crowd.

Tom Hardy does his best and his punch-drunk, dazed turn as Eddie Brock works, even if it is the end result of a performer pummelled into a stupor by a screenplay so egregiously inept it feels like it was written by a committee who mandated a random action sequence be inserted every time a focus group member started to doze off. Director Ruben Fleischer keeps the action dimly lit and choppy, ensuring that we don’t really get a good sense of Venom fighting for most of the scenes and developing an aesthetic that resembles Michael Bay’s “Transformers” with silly putty instead of shards of metal.

There are two post-credit scenes, the latter of which is basically an extended preview of “Spider-Man: Into The Spiderverse” and the former a completely pointless and unearned teaser for a sequel that surely won’t materialise. It’s what’s before the end credits that’s the problem, though, and in counting its symbiotes before they’ve hatched, Sony have shot themselves in the foot once again. I wouldn’t hold your breath for the recently announced Jared Leto-starring “Morbius” movie, even if you do decide to hold your nose and buy a ticket for “Venom”.

venom review
Score 4/10
logo

Related posts

Shin Godzilla (2017) Review

Shin Godzilla (2017) Review

Filming the monster only from the knee down would have been a gutsy move. The first ever Japanese production to completely reboot the venerable monster’s movie series, “Shin Godzilla” is so called because it’s deliberately ambiguous (written in katakana instead of kanji) and can be...

Doctor Who: War Of The Sontarans Review

Doctor Who: War Of The Sontarans Review

War Of The Sontarans sees the Doctor in need of a man with a pan Is Chibnall the Thane of Cawdor? Because nothing becomes his life as showrunner than the leaving of it, apparently. WAR OF THE SONTARANS brings us possibly his most complete and satisfying standalone DOCTOR WHO...

That Hope Is You, Part 2

That Hope Is You, Part 2

That 'Nope' is me, reacting to That Hope Is You, Part 2 *SPOILERS* If the episode title “That Hope Is You, Part 2” doesn’t tell you that this third season finale of “Star Trek: Discovery” is going to be an excerise in Burnham-style vanity, it doesn’t take long for the episode itself...

Planet Of The Vampires (1965) Review

Planet Of The Vampires (1965) Review

Hang on, I thought vampires were meant to be afraid of garlic? There’s something deliciously hypnotic about Planet of the Vampires (Terrore nello spazio, if you prefer its more evocative Italian title). Directed by Mario Bava - maestro of the macabre - this 1965 sci-fi horror hybrid...

Spider-Man: No Way Home (2021) Review

Spider-Man: No Way Home (2021) Review

From a certain point of view, Spider-Man: No Way Home might just be the worst movie in the MCU Despite being the preeminent movie franchise of the 21st century, rarely has the hype machine cranked up as high as it did for SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME. Could anything possibly succeed in...

The Secret Garden (2020) Review

The Secret Garden (2020) Review

The Secret Garden puts a chilly stiff-upper-lip spin on an old classic. There a sumptuous promise to this latest interpretation of Frances Hodgson Burnett’s 1911 novel “The Secret Garden”, bolstered by the handsome locations, that never quite feels fulfilled. Looks great, solid cast but...

Last Action Hero (1993) Review

Last Action Hero (1993) Review

People ignored this film when it was first released. Big mistake! Perennially underrated, often unfairly maligned (even by Schwarzenegger himself) as his first real failure, ironic action movie masterpiece “Last Action Hero” is twenty-five years old this year and way, way overdue for a...

The Butler (2013) Review

The Butler (2013) Review

The Butler is a generational family saga as polemic. For some reason, despite my not infrequent visits to the cinema, I’ve no recollection of ever seeing a trailer for “The Butler” and as a result, my expectations were formed mainly by the poster and the few snippets of information...

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
superdupercc
superdupercc
6 years ago

Four sounds generous!

Rodney Twelftree
6 years ago

ugh. The more I read about this film the more I’m convinced the clowns at Sony have no idea how to propagate a decent franchise. If they couldn’t even get Spidey right without Marvel’s help, how in the hell were they ever going to get a secondary character done properly? Great review, mate. I’m avoiding this movie until it’s out on digital, i’m not paying full price for a movie ticket for this trash.