Smith and Lawrence roll back the years, if not the mileage in Bad Boys For Life

Having spent a decade (and the best part of a billion dollars) smashing whirling dervishes of tinfoil and glass against each other in the “Transformers” franchise, it’s easy to forget that Michael Bay’s directorial style was almost fully formed when he made his directorial debut with “Bad Boys”. Although he also directed its louder, brasher, more obnoxious sequel, Bay isn’t back in the director’s chair for this belated third outing, although he does turn up “Bad Boys For Life” in a cameo as a wedding MC.

As Detective Marcus Burnett (Martin Lawrence) adjusts to life as a grandfather and contemplates retirement, his partner Mike Lowery (Will Smith) is determined to keep on living his best life. But a breakout from a maximum-security Mexican prison spells trouble for Mike as a vengeful cartel widow cuts a bloody swathe through everyone involved in locking her up.

Bay may not be in the director’s chair any more but co-directors Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah are careful not to stray very far from his tediously bombastic style for this threepeat of Miami mayhem. Scenes are drenched in tones of ochre and amber, there’s copious jocular bickering between the two leads and, of course, abundant vehicular destruction and an almost endless ejaculation of ordnance and ammunition.

The most curious thing about “Bad Boys For Life”, though, is the story’s structure – one of the strangest I’ve ever seen. At first, you might think it’s some kind of clever, non-linear conceit but then it becomes clear that no, it is linear, it’s just got any normal movie’s final act and coda at the beginning and where other movies might end, it just keeps right on trucking. It’s almost like you’ve taken your seat just in time to watch the final half-hour of one movie and then the sequel just starts carries on without pausing for breath.

Smith and Lawrence effortlessly recreate their onscreen chemistry – in truth the only thing which makes these movies watchable – and while, thanks to their advancing years, they lean ever more heavily into the “Lethal Weapon” knock-off this series has always been, their likability helps smooth out the movie’s uneven structure and scattergun plotting. To compensate for its stars’ waning stamina, the movie introduces a team of new recruits who drop in and out of the action as whatever set-piece is next requires and while they’re largely thinly written stereotypes, Vanessa Hudgens and Alexander Ludwig make a good impression and hopefully the whole gang will be back in the already announced fourth outing.

As for the bad guys, there’s a third act twist which strains credibility but the bad guys and gals are bloodthirsty and ruthless enough to bring some real peril to the heroes and while it’s not a horror film (despite a weirdly tentative flirtation with witchcraft) this third “Bad Boys” movie at least obeys Randy Meeks’ rules for surviving the third chapter of a trilogy almost to the letter:

  1. “You’ve got a killer who’s gonna be superhuman. Stabbing him won’t work, shooting him won’t work. Basically in the third one, you gotta cryogenically freeze his head, decapitate him, or blow him up.”
  2. “Anyone, including the main character, can die.”
  3. “The past will come back to bite you in the ass. Whatever you think you know about the past, forget it. The past is not at rest! Any sins you think were committed in the past are about to break out and destroy you.”

Mercifully shorter than its bloated predecessor, it’s a fun if forgettable way to pass the time if you’re in the market for some undemanding action fun but it does pose a more troubling question given it arrives hot on the heels of “Gemini Man” which features Smith taking on a similar adversary: does Will have some issues he needs to work out with Jayden? Hopefully, he’ll sort it out before we all have to endure “After Earth 2”.

bad boys for life review
Score 6/10
logo

Related posts

Sand Sharks (2012) Review

Sand Sharks (2012) Review

I didn't much like Sand Sharks. It's coarse and rough and irritating and it gets it wrong nearly everywhere.Well, would you look at this, a faint vestige of production values and technical ability! We even have a star name attached (Corin Nemec, “Parker Lewis Can’t Lose”...

Criminal (2016) Review

Criminal (2016) Review

How would I describe Criminal? Cruel and unusually punishing.Between this and last year’s “Self/Less”, you have to hope Ryan Reynolds has learned to never a borrower or a lender be, at least when it comes to his brain.When a CIA operative is killed in London, the agency brings in an...

Scary Stories To Tell In The Dark (2019) Review

Scary Stories To Tell In The Dark (2019) Review

Scary Stories To Tell In The Dark is a bland, timid entry suitable perhaps for patients recovering from surgery.Knowing very little of the original property, I didn’t know what to expect going in to “Scary Stories To Tell In The Dark”. What I got was a competently made and good looking...

Terrifier 2 (2022) Review

Terrifier 2 (2022) Review

The Art Of The Clown Is The Art Of Sadism.Terrifier 2 is what happens when a slasher movie gets a major upgrade but refuses to lose its mean streak. If Terrifier was a no-frills bloodbath, the sequel is its pumped-up, gore-drenched older sibling, now packing a little more budget, a...

I only know one truth. It’s time for thecraggus.com to end*

I only know one truth. It's time for thecraggus.com to end*

My inner monologue over the past few months.It’s been a crazy couple of years, right? First of all, lockdown didn’t seem so bad. Obviously, it was terrible that cinemas were forced to close but the silver lining was that suddenly I was in full control of what I could write...

The Equalizer 3 (2023) Review

The Equalizer 3 (2023) Review

Equalizer 3 dares to ask what if Michael Myers was a good guy?Imagine if Michael Myers, the infamous Shape from the Halloween franchise, decided to use his particular set of skills for good rather than evil. That’s essentially what you get with The Equalizer 3, where Robert McCall...