Despite high concept marketing, an overreliance on jump scares leaves me stony-faced during Smile

Adapted from his own 2020 short film LAURA HASN’T SLEPT, writer/ director Parker Finn takes the welcome approach of making SMILE a continuation rather than a rehash of the original, with Caitlin Stacey reprising her role of Laura and providing the instigating events which set SMILE into motion.

When Laura Weaver, a patient complaining of hallucinations of smiling people foretelling her death calmly slits her own throat in front of her, Doctor Rose Cotter (Sosie Bacon) is understandably horrified. But when another of her patients apparently starts grinning maniacally and predicting Rose’s own death, she begins to experience hallucinations of her own. As the hallucinations increase in frequency and intensity, Rose begins to believe that she is dealing with some kind of supernatural entity and must find a way to free herself of the curse.

The success of the viral marketing for the film lies in the simplicity of its motif, the smile. That damned smile. It’s a masterpiece of visual horror, the dissonance of the grinning mouth and the humourless, dead eyes, tapping into the exact same source of unease that both draws us into and repels us from the Uncanny Valley. Unfortunately, the trouble with this particular damned smile – and damned it surely is – is that it’s surrounded by a dull, almost studiously grey film which throws away its chilling potential in an escalating series of obnoxious jump scares and Russian-doll style bait-and-switch hallucinatory escapades.

That it succeeds at all is down to a strong central performance from Sosie Bacon, who shoulders the entire film while the underused supporting cast drift in and out, never quite behaving in a believable or sympathetic manner. There’s little to no flirting with ambiguity despite the unreliable nature of the narration and we’re left in little doubt that something supernatural is at work but while the entity’s nature isn’t clearly articulated, it’s hard to shake the feeling that SMILE falls back on retreading that path walked by the likes of THE RING or IT FOLLOWS instead of sinking its teeth into something fresh.

Despite its clinical setting, it doesn’t even find anything pertinent or insightful to say about the very real life horrors of untreated trauma and satisfies itself with a dispiritingly formulaic storytelling approach.

SMILE does have a few bravura moments (Rose’s nephew’s birthday party is a standout) and apparently ingratiated itself enough with cinema audiences to merit a sequel so I guess we’ll just have to grin and bear it for now.

Smile (2022) Review was last modified: November 4th, 2023 by Craig Holton

Related posts

Craggus' Trek Trek Now: Voyager - Vol.14

Here's your weekly Omnibus Edition of Craggus' Trek Trek Now: Voyager covering Season 4 Episode 24 to Season 5 Episode...

Across The View Askewniverse: Chasing Amy (1997) Review

Perhaps stung by the initial reaction to “Mallrats”, “Chasing Amy” sees Smith hew much closer to the down-to-earth authenticity of “Clerks”, this time wrapping his profane pop-culture infused dialogue around a romantic comedy with a twist, the twist being a more expansive view of sexuality...

Colossal (2017) Review

*POTENTIAL SPOILERS* It’s been a long time since a movie surprised me as much as “Colossal” did. Won over by the quirky trailer and a crazy but fascinating premise, I was expecting a quirky exploration of the characters exploring their 'inner demons’ in a very external manner. Instead...

Quantum Of Solace (2008) Review

I don’t really want to spend much time on “Quantum Of Solace”. After all the producers clearly didn’t. The shortest Bond film in the whole series, it’s still not short enough. Developed from a plot created by Michael G Wilson, the script was drafted by the “Casino Royale” team of Neal Purvis...