Forty years on, Amadeus still strikes a remarkable chord.

The story of Amadeus began, fittingly, not with Mozart but with Antonio Salieri. In the early 1980s, Peter Shaffer took the relatively obscure historical anecdotes surrounding Salieri’s supposed jealousy of Mozart’s talent and transmuted them into theatrical gold. The play premiered at the National Theatre in London in 1979, with Paul Scofield originally playing the tormented composer. By the time it reached Broadway, Ian McKellen and Tim Curry were mesmerizing audiences as Salieri and Mozart, respectively, and Shaffer’s richly fictionalised narrative had captured the imagination of theatre-goers.

Enter Milos Forman. The Czech director, already acclaimed for films such as One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, recognised in Shaffer’s work a story that could resonate beyond the stage. His keen understanding of characters at odds with the world around them dovetailed beautifully with Shaffer’s portrait of Salieri as a man consumed by the unfairness of being ordinary in the presence of divinity.

Forman’s Amadeus is as much Salieri’s tragedy as it is Mozart’s. Played with sublime gravitas by F. Murray Abraham, Salieri becomes the unreliable narrator of his own life—a composer of modest gifts who recognises genius not as inspiration but as a cruel rebuke. Abraham’s portrayal earned him a well-deserved Academy Award for Best Actor, and his performance remains a masterclass in restrained venom, regret, and obsession.

Opposite him, Tom Hulce’s Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart is unforgettable: part impish prodigy, part tragic flame-out. Hulce plays Mozart not as a one-dimensional wunderkind but as a mercurial figure whose brilliance and recklessness burn too brightly for the era’s decorum. The infamous laugh—that shrill, childlike burst of sound—is a character-defining choice, capturing Mozart’s refusal to conform even in something as small as his giggle.

Visually, Amadeus remains as indulgent and precise as a Mozart symphony. Prague, standing in for 18th-century Vienna, lends the film a rich authenticity, its gilded interiors and candlelit stages evoking an operatic splendour that never veers into mere spectacle. Yet, beneath the grandeur lies a story fuelled by the most human of emotions. The film’s visual and aural pleasures—including its deft deployment of Mozart’s music—are in service of a narrative about pride, failure, and divine injustice.

Critically, the film was an unqualified triumph. It swept the 1985 Academy Awards, winning eight Oscars, including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Adapted Screenplay. The industry accolades were matched by popular acclaim, as audiences were enraptured by Forman’s ability to make an 18th-century story feel immediate and relevant. Yet, its greatest legacy may be in its unexpected cultural aftermath: the rehabilitation of Salieri’s reputation.

Before Amadeus, Salieri’s name had faded into relative obscurity, remembered more as a historical footnote than as a composer of merit. The film and stage play ignited a renewed interest in his work, prompting performances and recordings of Salieri’s compositions that had languished in obscurity. Ironically, the tale that portrayed him as mediocrity personified also spurred an overdue reappraisal of his talent.

Of course, it is essential to acknowledge that Amadeus is less a biography than it is a parable. Historically, there is little evidence to support the narrative of Salieri’s murderous envy. By all reputable accounts, Salieri was a respected composer and pedagogue who enjoyed a successful career in his own right. The notion that he actively sabotaged Mozart—let alone confessed to poisoning him—is pure invention, but Forman and Shaffer have never claimed otherwise. Amadeus invites us to revel in the mythologising of artistic frustration and human frailty because it illuminates universal truths.

In its 40th year, Amadeus remains a cinematic aria of unparalleled beauty and complexity. It understands the paradox of music—how something so ephemeral can feel eternal—and captures the bittersweet tragedy of recognition that comes too late. Whether viewed as a historical drama or a philosophical fable, it endures because it recognises that greatness often sits uneasily alongside pettiness, and that we can both admire and resent the brilliance we are powerless to replicate.

Milos Forman’s sumptuous and audacious adaptation of Peter Shaffer’s stage play Amadeus is an unqualified cinematic masterpiece, a searing meditation on envy, genius, and the capricious nature of legacy. As Salieri fades into the shadows, his final benediction to the mediocrities of the world—”I absolve you all!”—rings out as a darkly comic hymn to our shared imperfections. For all its creative liberties, Amadeus soars as a requiem not just for Mozart, but for the unsung, the overlooked, and the tragically self-aware—a timeless reminder that art, like life, is often composed in dissonance.

amadeus review
Score 10/10


Hi there! If you enjoyed this post, why not sign up to get new posts sent straight to your inbox?

Sign up to receive a weekly digest of The Craggus' latest posts.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

logo

Related posts

Doctor Who: Village Of The Angels Review

Doctor Who: Village Of The Angels Review

For Flux sake - Village Of The Angels provides a few answers but poses even more questions VILLAGE OF THE ANGELS is, notably, the only episode of DOCTOR WHO: FLUX where the writing credits are shared, so it’s perhaps not surprising that it’s also the first episode of the season...

Machete (2010) Review

Machete (2010) Review

Machete makes Mexploitation fun! Ah, that's better. Leaving behind the pretensions of certain other films, "Machete" is a down and dirty, unabashedly fun and silly movie which single-handedly both redefines and subverts the genre of "Mexploitation". Developed from a fake movie...

Mr Peabody & Sherman (2014) Review

Mr Peabody & Sherman (2014) Review

Nostalgia is a hell of a drug. There is an itch that Hollywood just can’t seem to scratch. It’s a nagging, nostalgic yearning for something from its collective youth that try as it might, it just can’t seem to get to catch on with the modern audience. I’m talking, of course, of “The...

Firestarter (1984) Review

Firestarter (1984) Review

Firestarter flames out. There’s a curious contradiction at the heart of 1984's Firestarter: it's a film about uncontrollable power that feels completely restrained. Drew Barrymore illuminates the screen as Charlie, the girl with pyrokinetic abilities, but the movie around her is...

The New Mutants (2020) Review

The New Mutants (2020) Review

The New Mutants makes the same old mistakes Its eventual path to the big screen may have had a more convoluted timeline than even Christopher Nolan’s most unrestrained fever dream could have concocted for “Tenet”, but the question which dogs “The New Mutants” is ‘was it worth the...

Five Nights At Freddy’s (2023) Review

Five Nights At Freddy's (2023) Review

Five Nights At Freddy's? I have reservations. Growing up in the UK, we didn't have an equivalent of Chuck E. Cheese, so although I've no direct experience of the deep, abiding terror that gigantic animatronic anthropomorphic animals can instil in an entire generation, I can well...