How to reskin your franchise.

There’s a line in Marvel’s Avengers, where Steve Rogers and Tony Stark are arguing, and Stark tells Captain America that “everything special about you came out of a bottle”. Stark is, as he will come to learn, wrong but it’s a line that comes to mind every time people rave about Christopher Nolan’s The Prestige – because everything great about that movie comes from the source novel by Christopher Priest. The reason I bring this up is that while 2025’s How To Train Your Dragon is undeniably great fun, everything that’s great in it comes from the dragonfire-in-a-bottle captured by the 2010 original.

You can almost hear the studio mandate: don’t break it, just reskin everything with photorealistic fur, skin and scales. The live-action How To Train Your Dragon isn’t here to reinvent anything – it’s here to remind you what worked the first time, only this time with pores, windblown hair, and a dragon you could almost reach out and touch. It’s a skilled reproduction of an old master, and for the most part, it works precisely because it doesn’t ever try to be more than what it already was.

It helps that what it was remains quietly excellent. The 2010 film slipped a deceptively nuanced story of empathy, disability, and identity into the shape of a mainstream family blockbuster, like a prosthetic tail fin bolted to the familiar anatomy of the hero’s journey. The remake doesn’t meddle with the mechanics. It sticks close to the flight path, swapping stylised charm for textured spectacle and trusting the story to carry itself across the uncanny threshold of realism.

That trust is well-placed. Hiccup’s journey still lands with weight – more literal now, as every misstep and moment of connection plays out on actual faces and in physical spaces. The production design doesn’t reinterpret so much as reincarnate the original animation, bringing it into the tangible world with fidelity rather than flair. Villages, landscapes, even costume textures echo their animated counterparts with almost reverent precision. The dragons, too, are less redesigned than remapped – Toothless in particular feels like the same creature rendered at higher resolution, his physicality deepened but not reimagined, his expressiveness preserved rather than progressed.

The cast are all solid fits, more or less. Mason Thames (The Black Phone) steps into Hiccup’s boots with a convincing mix of nerves and ingenuity, while Nico Parker’s Astrid is given a touch more depth without dragging the pace. Gerard Butler returns as Stoick, the only major holdover from the original voice cast – because, frankly, nobody else could play Stoick quite like Butler – and brings a weightier, more physical authority to the role. There are grounds to suggest that the MVP of this live action remake might be Lucy Bevan, the casting director. Her selections are pitch-perfect reincarnations of their animated forebears. Julian Dennison (The Hunt For The Wilderpeople, Deadpool 2) brings a welcome dose of awkward charm as Fishlegs, while Gabriel Howell delivers a suitably puffed-up Snotlout, though the character’s bluster feels slightly toned down and entwined with a minor redemption story of his own. The twins – Ruffnut and Tuffnut, played by Bronwyn James (Wicked) and Harry Trevaldwyn – are almost too good a recreation of the characters even if they don’t quite match the chaotic snap of their animated counterparts. Even Nick Frost, although initially struggling to fill Craig Ferguson’s vocal boots, eventually comes good with a performance of gruff, bluff warmth that shows why he’s recently been cast in the pivotal role of Hagrid in another upcoming unnecessary reboot.

What’s missing from the film, of course, is surprise. The film plays so closely to the original that even its best emotional beats come with the muscle memory of previous impact. Nothing here falls flat, but there’s little risk either. Where the animated version earned its wings by slipping past your expectations, this version banks on your affection already being secured. It’s a greatest hits tour rather than a debut, and it knows it.

Still, when this How To Train Your Dragon finally arrives at its crescendo – boy and dragon, both maimed, both magnificent, flying as one – it still sticks the landing. Not because of what’s changed, but because the core still hums with the same conviction: that difference isn’t something to overcome, it’s the thing to be embraced to make greatness possible. The remake doesn’t deepen that message, but it doesn’t dilute it either. It simply reaffirms it, with polish, precision, and a little more photorealism.

how to train your dragon 2025 review
Score 8/10


Hi there! If you enjoyed this post, why not sign up to get new posts sent straight to your inbox?

Sign up to receive a weekly digest of The Craggus' latest posts.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

logo

Related posts

Charlie’s Angels (2000) Review

Charlie's Angels (2000) Review

There's no need to throw your hands up at Charlie's Angels There’s a general rule to bringing a classic TV show to the big screen and it either involves going bigger – in stunts and special effects – or deeper, digging into the mythology. The millennial sequel to “Charlie’s Angels”...

Doctor Who: The Caretaker Review

Doctor Who: The Caretaker Review

It doesn't matter whether I liked or hated The Caretaker, was it good enough for us? Okay – "The Caretaker", I think, is the episode where I’m going to say Season 8 of “Doctor Who” has clicked, and all the pieces have snapped together in a pleasingly familiar...

Kung Fu Panda 4 (2024) Review

Kung Fu Panda 4 (2024) Review

Jack Black's as charming as ever, but the kung fu feels weak this time Returning to the big screen after an absence of eight years, KUNG FU PANDA 4 sees Po (Jack Black) wrestling with the next step in his journey: from warrior to master. Of course, if you’ve been following his...

Diana (2013) Review

Diana (2013) Review

There’s no room in anyone’s heart for this cheap and pointless biopic. There’s nothing in this flat, uninspired biopic which will change your opinion on the late Diana, Princess of Wales whatever it was: either a precious, much wronged saintly victim of a callous and cruel...

White House Down (2013) Review

White House Down (2013) Review

White House Dumb. I went to see “White House Down” against my better judgement. I owe my better judgement an apology. It’s impossible to reflect on “White House Down” without mentioning “Olympus Has Fallen”, the similarly (and by similarly, I mean almost identically) themed action...

Æon Flux (2005) Review

Æon Flux (2005) Review

No Flux left to give: why Æon deserves another look. Nobody blinks in Æon Flux. Not in surprise, not in pain, not even in recognition. It’s as if the entire cast is caught in a slow-motion perfume advert set in a bioengineered terrarium, held aloft by conviction and chromatic gels. And...

Mars Attacks! (1997) Review

Mars Attacks! (1997) Review

If you're looking for anarchic alien antics, Mars Attacks! is the Topps. Goofy, macabre and deliciously, satirically silly, “Mars Attacks!” sees Tim Burton indulge his inner Irwin Allen and go full Seventies disaster movie, channelling Ed Wood and nodding to Stanley Kubrick as he does...

Sex Tape (2014) Review

Sex Tape (2014) Review

Being accidentally topical isn't enough to save the aggressively unfunny Sex Tape. Clearly the reunion of the director and stars of 2011's amusingly bawdy "Bad Teacher" was intended to replicate that film's edginess and success. Unfortunately, "Sex Tape" is an egregiously foul-mouthed...

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments