Smokey and the man, bit

Sam Fuller’s Shark! is one of those films where the behind-the-scenes drama often overshadows what ends up on screen. Initially conceived as a thrilling adventure set against the sun-scorched landscapes of the Red Sea, it stars Burt Reynolds as Caine, a gunrunner entangled with a treasure-seeking couple and, naturally, a very menacing shark.

In the sweltering waters of the Red Sea, down-on-his-luck gunrunner Caine (Burt Reynolds) reluctantly partners with the enigmatic Anna (Silvia Pinal) and her cunning associate, Professor Mallare (Barry Sullivan), in a quest to recover sunken treasure under the cover of a scientific expedition. Along the way, Caine encounters Runt (Manuel Alvarado), a young local pickpocket who becomes his loyal sidekick. As they dive deeper into their perilous mission, they face not only the lurking threat of a deadly shark but also the very real dangers of greed and betrayal within their own ranks.

The production was notoriously troubled, marred by on-set accidents and budgetary constraints that overshadowed Fuller’s vision. Reynolds himself was reportedly dissatisfied, a sentiment reflected in the film’s often disjointed feel. Intended as a gripping tale of adventure and danger, the result is a somewhat fragmented story that struggles to maintain tension and coherence.

Yet, the movie’s atmosphere is undeniably immersive, benefiting from its exotic location. The cinematography captures the arid beauty of the setting, almost redeeming the film’s slower, more tedious moments. Almost. The pacing drags, and the script meanders, often leaving Reynolds to carry the film with his natural charisma.What works in Shark! is the visual and atmospheric depth, showcasing Fuller’s ability to conjure a world both alluring and perilous. The supporting cast, particularly Pinal and Kennedy, manage to infuse their roles with depth despite the often lacklustre dialogue. There remains a rugged charm to Shark!, hinting at what might have been a gripping adventure had the stars aligned more favourably during its troubled production.

In the grand oeuvre of Sam Fuller, Shark! treads water in the shallower end. Known for his gritty, hard-hitting narratives, Fuller’s touch here seems diluted, his usual storytelling vigour compromised. The themes of human greed and survival are present but lack the punch seen in his more acclaimed works like Pickup on South Street or The Big Red One. There are elements of Reynolds’ performance as Caine that evoke a mix of Sean Connery’s Bond and Harrison Ford’s Indiana Jones, with his relationship with Runt sketching a dynamic fully realized decades later in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.

shark! review

Ultimately, Shark! is a cinematic curiosity. It offers glimpses of adventure amidst its sun-drenched backdrops, but much like a mirage, it fades upon closer inspection. The apocryphal tale of a stuntman’s death by shark during filming adds a layer of grim intrigue, but in the end, it’s not much more than a dirty, pulpy adventure movie that doesn’t quite realize its full potential.

shark weak 5
shark! review
logo

Related posts

Unfriended (2015) Review

Unfriended (2015) Review

Web-based horror flick Unfriended gives us a very anti-social network. I have to say, I honestly thought the first real foray into ‘social networking’ horror movie would be some form of Snapchat exchange movie, where the plot unfolds in a series of 10 second vignettes building up to some...

Superman (2025) Review

Superman (2025) Review

It may be a clumsy take-off but for better or worse, Gunn's new DCU is up, up and underway! Messy rather than messianic, Gunn’s Superman, the foundation stone of the new DCU, rejects Snyder’s allegorical saviour in favour of colourful and crowded chaos. Beginning in media res – that...

Bastille Day (2016) Review

Bastille Day (2016) Review

No Americans were harmed (or involved) in the making of CIA thriller Bastille Day. Ever since Daniel Craig’s less than effusive publicity tour for “SPECTRE”, speculation has been rife as to who the next Bond will be. The pretenders to the throne have likewise wasted no time in setting...

The Satanic Rites Of Dracula (1973) Review

The Satanic Rites Of Dracula (1973) Review

He kills in a house, a very big house in the country. We start out where “Dracula AD 1972” ended: with terrible music. This time, though, it actually sort of fits because “The Satanic Rites Of Dracula” actually is a cheesy seventies spy thriller of sorts. When a secret agent barely...

8th Anniversary Post

8th Anniversary Post

8th Anniversary Post At 20:22 on the 7th of June 2013, I clicked on the "publish" button for the very first time, posting my very first review, the uninspiring and now all-but-forgotten I GIVE IT A YEAR. Thankfully, the film's title wasn't a prognosis of the blog's future and...

Spiral: From The Book Of Saw (2021)

Spiral: From The Book Of Saw (2021)

All cops actually are bastards in sub-standard splatter sequel Spiral: From The Book Of Saw. SPIRAL may lay claim to being FROM THE BOOK OF SAW but the only tome director Darren Lynn Bousman and writers Josh Stolberg and Pete Goldfinger seem to have cracked open is the “Big Book Of Cop...